data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34756/3475613b80a6046f3d3f45bea399d72b63061605" alt=""
Of the many aspects of human nature that define us both culturally and physically, it is our inherent desire to ‘belong and be apart of a greater fraternity’ that remains one of the most prominent. From a purely physical standpoint, this desire makes perfect sense. As human beings, we are in a constant search for our identity and place in society, a search which is made ultimately easier by finding a group in which to align to.
Emerging from this yearning for group membership is that of the social network. ‘A social network is a set of people connected by a set of socially meaningful relationships’ states Wellman, and it is these sequences of relationships that satiate our yearning for the support and identity construction. In this current age of globalisation and technological advancement, the desire to assimilate has not changed. The amazing success of social networking websites such as MySpace, Facebook and Friendster is a testament to society’s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f09/59f09fedfa9baa802d7078e6ea455ea64523fd17" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7c5a/d7c5abdf7cd7e7327c1bfb59d55719e22adb0fa6" alt=""
In the coming blogs, I will discuss the new and enhanced form of social networking through the internet, with a distinct concentration on the new opportunities for identity construction, as well as the conflict which arises from corporate aggregation of these websites. In this discussion I will focus primarily on the most popular social networking sites, such as MySpace, Friendster and Facebook, as all three sites encompass the core values of internet social networking. In order to analyse these networks properly however, they must be compared with the old physical style networks to gauge their efficiency.
No comments:
Post a Comment